Episode 80

full
Published on:

9th May 2025

Animal ForensiCon 2025: Jury Selection and Expert Testimony with Laura Hope

Laura Hope, Assistant State Attorney for the 5th Circuit, shares information on jury selection and expert witness testimony in jury trials.

The 2025 Animal ForensiCon: The Animal Forensic Investigations Conference is a three-day event, offered in Daytona Beach Shores, Florida from May 7th to 9th, 2025. The conference is hosted by the University of Florida’s Veterinary Forensic Sciences Laboratory.

ForensiCon offers workshops and educational sessions on a wide variety of topics pertaining to criminal investigations, law, small animal investigations, equine and livestock investigations, and wildlife crimes. This conference is open to anyone interested in animal forensic investigations. Attendees will also have the opportunity to network with faculty, experts, and investigators

Transcript
DrG:

The first lecture this morning was on jury selection, and here to

2

:

talk to us about it is Laura Hope.

3

:

Thank you so much for being here.

4

:

Laura Hope: Thank you for having me.

5

:

Good morning.

6

:

DrG: Can you tell us about

yourself, where you work and what

7

:

brought you to this line of work?

8

:

Laura Hope: Sure.

9

:

I am an assistant state

attorney for the Fifth Circuit.

10

:

In other words, I'm a prosecutor.

11

:

And I, I came to the job because

while I was in law school, I was in

12

:

mock trial, which means I tried cases

that were fake and I loved it, and

13

:

I loved the courtroom, so I got a

job and here I am a few years later.

14

:

DrG: Your talk was about jury selection,

which is really, really important.

15

:

And you were talking about different

tips and tricks as far as doing it.

16

:

So I guess overall, what

do you look for in a jury?

17

:

Laura Hope: Sure.

18

:

What I look for in a jury

is for them to be impartial.

19

:

Depending on my case, can they set

aside their biases and render a

20

:

verdict just based on the evidence?

21

:

So, for example, if I have, you

know, an animal cruelty case, right?

22

:

And uh, particularly I have a person

who's very sensitive to animal abuse,

23

:

I may not want that person on the jury

because they wouldn't be ideal for it.

24

:

They might be partial to

me, and that's not fair.

25

:

You know, likewise, if you've got a

person that doesn't care much about

26

:

animal abuse that they don't think

that should be regulated by law,

27

:

I do not want that person on the jury

because they wouldn't, they might

28

:

have a problem following the law.

29

:

DrG: I took an animal law class and one

of the things that they were talking about

30

:

is that sometimes jurors that are very

pro animal welfare may not be the ones

31

:

that are great for animal welfare, not

only because they may be biased against

32

:

the the person, but if you have somebody

like a hoarder or somebody that had

33

:

good intentions but did something really

bad, then that person may potentially

34

:

identify with them and then, you know,

35

:

backfire.

36

:

Laura Hope: Yeah.

37

:

Right.

38

:

No, I, I mean, that's true.

39

:

It's such, it's so complex because

you truly have to listen to what

40

:

they're saying and you're almost

gonna have to take a guess.

41

:

Is this person going to

be good for my jury panel?

42

:

Are they gonna be able to just look at

the facts and, and render a verdict?

43

:

It's, it's kind of, it's kind

of a guessing game that you

44

:

practice at to get better.

45

:

DrG: And you talked about bias

and a lot of people say, well, I'm

46

:

not biased, but we are all biased.

47

:

I mean, yeah, like,

that's the reality of it.

48

:

But it's a matter of kind of like

what, where your biases lie, right?

49

:

Laura Hope: Yeah.

50

:

It's a matter of, like you said,

we all have biases, but it's a

51

:

matter of can you set it aside?

52

:

Right.

53

:

Some are, some of our biases are so

deep within us that we just can't.

54

:

You know, particularly in domestic

abuse cases, if you were a victim of

55

:

domestic abuse for years, for example,

as much as you wanna try to be impartial,

56

:

you really may not be able to because

as you're listening to these facts,

57

:

you're identifying, you know, and so

58

:

no, you would strike that person.

59

:

DrG: Yeah.

60

:

So going towards the expert witness

side of it, how they conduct

61

:

themselves can have an impact

on the jurors, is that right?

62

:

Laura Hope: Oh, absolutely.

63

:

Um, like I said in there, when, when I'm

talking to an expert, we're, we're kind

64

:

of putting on a show for the jury and not

in a show, a as as far as like somewhat

65

:

entertainment, but a show as we are

trying to condense hours of preparation,

66

:

complicated material.

67

:

And we're trying to condense

that in an hour, maybe an

68

:

hour and a half presentation.

69

:

And not only that, we're trying to

engage the jury and we're trying

70

:

to make it as simple as possible.

71

:

So, you know, a couple of tips for

expert witnesses is if, if, for example,

72

:

you've got a canned answer that you

like, what is forensic pathology, for

73

:

example, when you're giving that answer,

I would say be mindful, slow down.

74

:

Emphasize in places that you might

want to emphasize, because I've seen it

75

:

before in court where they just, they

just say their entire answer because

76

:

they've memorized it and they move on.

77

:

So remember that you are speaking to

a jury and you're trying to engage

78

:

with everything that you're saying.

79

:

Um, so that would be one of my tips.

80

:

Watch for canned answers.

81

:

Another one would be, as you are giving

your testimony, look at their faces.

82

:

How engaged are they?

83

:

Are they interested?

84

:

Are you losing them?

85

:

Are they, do they show confusion?

86

:

Do we have to go back and explain that?

87

:

Another tip that I did in there is, um,

you know, speak to me as the prosecutor

88

:

in the same tone, same manner as you

would speak to the defense attorney.

89

:

'cause at the end of the

day, you know what you know.

90

:

The defense attorney like me, they're

trying to learn this particular area

91

:

of law in the few hours that we had to

prepare, but you know, the ins and out.

92

:

So when they're asking you a

question and that question is wrong.

93

:

Answer it with facts and answer

it with education as opposed to,

94

:

you know, showing that you didn't

like the question, for example.

95

:

DrG: Yeah.

96

:

I think that that, that plays a

lot in gaining credibility and

97

:

Laura Hope: Oh, yeah.

98

:

DrG: Like if the jury doesn't like you,

they may not believe what you have to say.

99

:

Laura Hope: Right.

100

:

DrG: Right.

101

:

Laura Hope: Or if the jury thinks

you're biased about something,

102

:

they just may tune you out.

103

:

DrG: Yeah.

104

:

And another thing that I have learned

is, you know, as veterinarians

105

:

we're taught all these big words

and then you show up and then you

106

:

wanna give all these big words.

107

:

Laura Hope: Thank you.

108

:

DrG: And you sound almost like,

like you're trying to show that

109

:

you're smarter than everybody else.

110

:

And realistically, you wanna make

it like lay person, and it's okay to

111

:

use a big word, but then explain it.

112

:

And not explain it in like,

well, let me tell you what

113

:

this means because you're dumb.

114

:

Right?

115

:

Like, right.

116

:

Let me explain what this means.

117

:

You know, this is what we call

it, but this is what it means.

118

:

Laura Hope: Yes.

119

:

You know, I, I think that when you're an

expert witness, you're almost a teacher.

120

:

Well, actually you are a teacher

because if you take the role of I know

121

:

everything, and I'm trying to tell you

guys what is right, or you know how it's

122

:

done, the jury's not gonna like you.

123

:

They may not even believe you.

124

:

What you want is you want to engage with

them, and I always say that if you truly

125

:

know your subject, you can simplify it.

126

:

If you can't simplify the subject,

you may not know it as well as you

127

:

think you know it kind of thing.

128

:

DrG: Yeah.

129

:

Yeah.

130

:

That makes perfect sense.

131

:

And it's like, I feel that a lot of

veterinarians are afraid to get on

132

:

the stand and then not know an answer.

133

:

And it is okay to just say,

134

:

Laura Hope: I don't know.

135

:

DrG: I don't know.

136

:

Laura Hope: Yeah.

137

:

DrG: I don't know the

answer to this question.

138

:

Laura Hope: Yeah.

139

:

DrG: So, you know, it's like, don't,

don't embellish, don't try to make stuff

140

:

up because that's how you get in trouble.

141

:

Laura Hope: Yep.

142

:

And I always say, I always tell 'em,

listen, you're just there to talk about

143

:

what you know, what you've reviewed.

144

:

You're not there to win the case for me.

145

:

You're not there to argue for me.

146

:

And, and that actually, you know, brings

me to a point when you're an expert

147

:

witness, know exactly what you reviewed.

148

:

Have a list?

149

:

You know, did you watch the body cameras?

150

:

Um, did you read the incident report?

151

:

Did you listen to the 911 phone call?

152

:

what medical records did you review?

153

:

Because what if you are not completely

sure by, with details what you reviewed?

154

:

What if the defense attorney has

a, you know, a piece of evidence

155

:

like, oh, so you didn't see this?

156

:

You know, and even though that piece of

evidence may not ultimately change your

157

:

opinion, the jury may think it should.

158

:

DrG: Right?

159

:

Yeah.

160

:

They may think that you're not prepared,

that you already had made your mind and

161

:

it doesn't matter what else is there, that

you, you've already made your decision.

162

:

And that's one of the things, I mean,

that's the other thing is when I'm going

163

:

into a case, obviously I'm on the side

of the animals, the animal welfare,

164

:

but you cannot sound like you're being

hateful, like for the other person.

165

:

Everything is objective, right?

166

:

Everything is about.

167

:

This is why I am making my

decision, not because I don't like

168

:

this person as a human being, but

because of the facts of this case.

169

:

Laura Hope: Absolutely.

170

:

And honestly, if you are testifying for

the state, you almost have the luxury

171

:

that your objective opinion and your

subjective opinion are kind of the same.

172

:

DrG: Yeah.

173

:

Well, uh, thank you so

much for being here.

174

:

It was a great lecture and I think

that a lot of people are going to

175

:

learn, you know, some tips about

the importance of the jurors and how

176

:

to handle themselves in, in court.

177

:

Laura Hope: Thank you

so much for having me.

Listen for free

Show artwork for The Animal Welfare Junction

About the Podcast

The Animal Welfare Junction
Veterinary Forensics
The Animal Welfare Junction is a podcast developed to bring awareness to different topics in animal welfare. The host, Michelle Gonzalez (Dr. G) is a veterinarian who provides affordable veterinary care in the State of Ohio, and also a Forensic Veterinarian helping with the investigation and prosecution of cases of animal cruelty and neglect.
The topics presented are based on the experiences of Dr. G and our guests and include discussions about real cases, humane projects, and legal issues that affect animals and the community. Due to the nature of the discussion, listener discretion is advised as some topics may be too strong for some listeners.

About your host

Profile picture for Alba Gonzalez

Alba Gonzalez

Michelle González (DrG) was born and raised in Puerto Rico. Her passion growing up was to become a veterinarian. She obtained a B.S. in Zoology at Michigan State University and the Doctor of Veterinary Medicine degree at The Ohio State University, followed by a 1-yr Internship in Medicine, Surgery, Emergency and Critical Care at the University of Missouri-Columbia. In 2006 she founded the Rascal Unit, a mobile clinic offering accesible and affordable sterilization, and wellness services throughout the State of Ohio.
Dr. G is involved in many aspects of companion veterinary medicine including education, shelter assistance and help to animals that are victims of cruelty and neglect.
DrG completed a Master’s degree in Veterinary Forensics from the University of Florida and a Master’s in Forensic Psychology from Southern New Hampshire University. She is currently enrolled at the University of Florida Forensic Science program. She assists Humane organizations and animal control officers in the investigation, evaluation, and prosecution of cases of animal cruelty and neglect.